Knowledge Centre
9th May 2008
Concern appears to be growing over the prospect of a register of 'dishonest staff', which some retailers plan to use to screen candidates.
The National Staff Dismissal Register (NSDR) is due to be launched this month and will hold details of those "who have been dismissed or have left employment while being investigated for acts of dishonesty towards the company".
The register has been set up by Action Against Business Crime (AABC), a partnership between the British Retail Consortium and the Home Office, in association with Hicom Business Solutions. Organisers say that the scheme is backed by retailers including HMV, Harrods and Mothercare, as well staffing agency Reed Managed Services.
However, critics believe the scheme could blacklist employees who had either been unfairly accused or who had simply fallen out with their employer.
Both the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and civil liberties campaign group Liberty expressed their disquiet in a feature published by BBC News, with Liberty's legal director James Welch commenting that the scheme appeared "to bypass existing laws which protect employees".
Meanwhile much of the discussion of the register on the UK Business Forums website has been sympathetic to the aims of the scheme but scathing of its possible impact.
"I cannot believe that a government body is behind this project," said one contributor, adding that "the potential for misuse here is staggeringly high."
Concerns over 'dishonest staff' database

The National Staff Dismissal Register (NSDR) is due to be launched this month and will hold details of those "who have been dismissed or have left employment while being investigated for acts of dishonesty towards the company".
The register has been set up by Action Against Business Crime (AABC), a partnership between the British Retail Consortium and the Home Office, in association with Hicom Business Solutions. Organisers say that the scheme is backed by retailers including HMV, Harrods and Mothercare, as well staffing agency Reed Managed Services.
However, critics believe the scheme could blacklist employees who had either been unfairly accused or who had simply fallen out with their employer.
Both the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and civil liberties campaign group Liberty expressed their disquiet in a feature published by BBC News, with Liberty's legal director James Welch commenting that the scheme appeared "to bypass existing laws which protect employees".
Meanwhile much of the discussion of the register on the UK Business Forums website has been sympathetic to the aims of the scheme but scathing of its possible impact.
"I cannot believe that a government body is behind this project," said one contributor, adding that "the potential for misuse here is staggeringly high."
Post to:
What are these?
No comments have been published yet.
- 20th January 2011 Unemployment figures hit 2.5 million
- 14th January 2011 Government 'must introduce fuel duty stabiliser'
- 7th January 2011 FSB call 'to reverse VAT rise'
Site by Acknowledgement
